Markdown source

AI Sandboxes Credibility

Use Case

Rank people or sources for agent runtime isolation, tool permissions, code execution, and sandbox safety.

View Signal Role

Very low. Isolation credibility should follow production security and runtime evidence, not popularity.

Scoring Weights

| Signal | Weight |

| --- | ---: |

| `topic_fit` | 20 |

| `security_infra_practice` | 30 |

| `production_isolation` | 25 |

| `evidence_source` | 15 |

| `peer_recognition` | 5 |

| `public_attention` | 5 |

Evaluation Fixtures

| Name | Score | Expected Min | Result |

| --- | ---: | ---: | --- |

| Solomon Hykes | 89.00 | 82 | pass |

| Samuel Colvin | 86.50 | 80 | pass |

Policy Boundary

This policy scores credibility for one topic and use case. Do not reuse it for unrelated topics where public fame, domain credentials, implementation depth, or primary-source evidence should be weighted differently.

Change Rule

Change one policy file at a time, rerun python3 scripts/generate_synthesis_layers.py, and inspect credibility policy evals before applying new scores.